BACTERIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF NEONATAL SEPTICEMIA AND ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY PATTERN OF THE ISOLATES IN TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL

A SHAH; A IQBAL; A WAKEEL; A ULLAH; AU DIN

doi:10.54112/pjicm.v5i02.164

Authors

A SHAH Department of Paediatrics, Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad, Pakistan
A IQBAL Department of Paediatrics, Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad, Pakistan
A WAKEEL Department of Paediatrics, Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad, Pakistan
A ULLAH Department of Paediatrics, Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad, Pakistan
AU DIN Department of Paediatrics, Combined Military Hospital Abbottabad, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54112/pjicm.v5i02.164

Keywords:

Neonatal Septicemia, Bacteriological Profile, Antibiotic Susceptibility, Multidrug Resistance, Gram-Negative Pathogens

Abstract

Background: Neonatal septicemia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, particularly in developing countries. The identification of causative organisms and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns is essential for guiding effective empirical therapy and reducing adverse outcomes. Objective: To determine the bacteriological profile of neonatal septicemia and evaluate the antibiotic susceptibility patterns of the isolates in a tertiary care hospital. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Department of Pediatrics at Combined Military Hospital, Abbottabad, Pakistan. Duration of Study: 12-January-2025 to 12-May-2025. Methods: A total of 176 neonates aged 1–20 days presenting with clinical signs of septicemia and positive blood cultures were enrolled. Standard microbiological techniques were used to isolate and identify causative organisms, including Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Candida, Staphylococcus aureus, Acinetobacter, and Klebsiella. Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed for meropenem, amikacin, tigecycline, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, linezolid, colistin, and cefepime using standard protocols. Data analysis was carried out using SPSS version 24. Results: The mean age of the neonates was 10.37 ± 5.64 days, with a mean birth weight of 3.44 ± 0.44 kg. Gram-negative organisms predominated, with Klebsiella (30.1%) and Acinetobacter (25.6%) being the most frequently isolated organisms. High resistance rates were observed against cefepime (73.9%) and ciprofloxacin (56.2%). The highest susceptibility rates were noted for vancomycin (90.9%), linezolid (88.1%), and colistin (81.2%). Conclusion: Klebsiella and Acinetobacter were the leading causes of neonatal septicemia in this study. Vancomycin, linezolid, and colistin showed the greatest sensitivity and may be considered effective options for empirical therapy in neonatal septicemia.

References

Marcdante KJ, Kliegman RM, Schuh AM. Nelson essentials of pediatrics. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2023.

Rouhi S, Nachate S, Lamrani Hanchi A, Bennaoui F, Slitine N, FMR M, et al. Neonatal septicemia: clinical and epidemiological features. Saudi J Pathol Microbiol. 2022;7(4):180–5. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjpm.2022.v07i04.005

Kuzniewicz MW, Mukhopadhyay S, Li S, Walsh EM, Puopolo KM. Time to positivity of neonatal blood cultures for early-onset sepsis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2020;39(7):634–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000002632

Kucova P, Kantor L, Fiserova K, Lasak J, Roderova M, Kolar M. Bacterial pathogens and evaluation of a cut-off for defining early and late neonatal infection. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021;10(3):278. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10030278

Gilfillan M, Bhandari V. Neonatal sepsis biomarkers: where are we now? Res Rep Neonatol. 2019;9:9–20. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRN.S163082

Yadav P, Yadav SK. Progress in diagnosis and treatment of neonatal sepsis: a review article. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2022;60(247):318–24. https://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.7324

Almohammady MN, Eltahlawy EM, Reda NM. Pattern of bacterial profile and antibiotic susceptibility among neonatal sepsis cases at Cairo University Children Hospital. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2020;15(1):39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtumed.2019.12.001

Gao K, Fu J, Guan X, Zhu S, Zeng L, Xu X, et al. Incidence, bacterial profiles, and antimicrobial resistance of culture-proven neonatal sepsis in South China. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:3797–3805. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S223597

Akhter R, Milli LS, Hossain NF, Kismat S. A study on bacteriological profile of neonatal septicemia and antibiotic sensitivity pattern. Ann Int Med Dent Res. 2023;9(4):173–82. https://doi.org/10.53339/aimdr.2023.9.4.22

Ibrahim BA, Damiri B, Allahadi H, Qadi M. Bacteriological profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of septicemia in neonatal intensive care units in Palestine: a retrospective study. IJID Regions. 2024;10:87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijregi.2023.11.019

Ehsan S, Marium R. Bacteriological profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of isolates in neonatal sepsis. Pak J Health Sci. 2023;4(3):44–9. https://doi.org/10.54393/pjhs.v4i03.608

Jaybhaye D, Chandra S, Johar S, Nagre AS. Bacteriological profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of neonatal septicaemia—a prospective study. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2023;10(4):506–9. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20230727

Jyothi P, Basavaraj MC, Basavaraj PV. Bacteriological profile of neonatal septicemia and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the isolates. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2013;4(2):306–9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-9668.116981